|
|
|
by Peter
Pappas |
|
www.peterpappas.com |
|
|
|
Waynesboro Area School District |
|
August 19, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portions of this presentation are based on a
talk given by Heidi Hayes Jacobs
August 24, 2001 Webster New York |
|
Heidi Hayes Jacobs website: |
|
http://www.curriculumdesigners.com/ |
|
|
|
|
New standards and assessments |
|
Rising accountability and expectations |
|
No Child Left Behind |
|
Testing overload |
|
Changing demographics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our curricula are disorganized, superficial
snapshots |
|
To forge a common vision for teaching and
learning |
|
To provide our teachers with the tools to be
successful |
|
To capture the legacy of our senior teachers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need a common process to follow |
|
We should all be teaching it. |
|
Revise and edit in all classes |
|
All focusing on contextual use of vocabulary |
|
|
|
|
Calendar-based mapping is a procedure for
collecting a data base of the operational curriculum in school or district |
|
It links content, skills, assessments to time
and standards |
|
Expands our understanding of the students’
learning experience |
|
|
|
|
Communications - teachers, students,
administration, parents, community |
|
Planning – curriculum, assessments, reforms |
|
Resource allocation - space, time, materials |
|
Staff development |
|
|
|
|
To align content, skills and assessments |
|
Pace instruction over time |
|
Help discover gaps and repetitions |
|
Decide what stays and what gets cut out |
|
Identify areas for integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell us what is taught. |
|
They’re calendar based
because they exist in time |
|
Provide us with a framework to evaluate student
work |
|
When you have data you attack problems, not each
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The text is not the curriculum, what you do with
it is the curriculum |
|
The state standards are not the curriculum, they
come to life in our program |
|
We make choices about content, skills and
assessments for our students - a discreet group of learners |
|
|
|
|
The map comes to life
with the teachers in the classroom |
|
Teachers can provide creative approaches to
reaching a common objective |
|
Stay focused on what's good for the child, we
can disagree on the approach - we
have a basis to compare |
|
Instructional time is saved by common entry /
exit level skills and knowledge |
|
|
|
|
It establishes standards for
mastery of knowledge and skills |
|
Teachers able respond to variance among learners
in the classroom |
|
Differentiate by content, process, product,
learning environment |
|
|
|
|
It produces a better understanding of the
strengths and weaknesses of your program. |
|
Soon you’ll be talking about goals, instruction
and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Focus on the measurable competences |
|
Don’t teach to the test – teach the skills
students need to be successful on the test |
|
Approach skill development as multi-year
endeavors |
|
|
|
|
Teachers and administrators finish the map
- consider a discussion with
parents and community |
|
Articulate learning experiences that are
meaningful to multiple audiences |
|
Remember different groups want different data |
|
Forces us to speak in plain English |
|
|
|
|
Be ready to address how we hold children accountable that may never reach the
standards |
|
If done correctly, then we are describing a
standard that already exists in the community |
|
We can give students skills and knowledge at a
time in life when they can actually do something about it |
|
|
|
|
We’ve ceded the agenda to
business and politicians |
|
We are a very expensive service –we have to
demonstrate we can provide it efficiently and effectively |
|
People expect good customer service |
|
|
|
|
We need to get people talking |
|
It’s dynamic, not a 5 year cycle |
|
It gives us a language to discuss what we do |
|
It’s an occasion for teachers to learn |
|
We model higher level thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intro |
|
|
|
Survivor |
|
|
|
Rigor and Relevance |
|
Personal View |
|
|
|
Project Website |
|
|
|
www.edteck.com |
|